Showing posts with label Atheism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Atheism. Show all posts

Monday, May 19, 2008

Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed

Saw the Intelligent Design vs. Evolution film Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed and as I was leaving I asked another patron of the theater (unknown to me) what he thought of the film. His words were, "I thought it was brilliant."

I thought of the line in Ecclesiastes, "There is nothing new under the sun."

Ben Stein travels and interviews people from both sides of the theory aisle (evolution versus intelligent design) simply asking questions that show both sides have questions and many of their answers are couched in terms like "maybe" and "if".

Basically the film shows that the evolution crowd has pushed the ID'ers out of the classrooms and laboratories blackballing them from scientific research and research grants. Some evolutionists are sitting around wearing earmuffs and blinders and this while they are still forced to say "maybe" and "if" when questioned about the origins of life...

I saw it as showing the power struggle for control of the cash. - But then I'm a cynic.

Did a bit of running around the net before posting this and I came up with a couple spots that are worth viewing.

Six Things in Expelled That Ben Stein Doesn't Want You to Know... is a Scientific American article by John Rennie and Steve Mirsky which says in it's opening paragraph,

"In the film Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed, narrator Ben Stein poses as a "rebel" willing to stand up to the scientific establishment in defense of freedom and honest, open discussion of controversial ideas like intelligent design (ID). But Expelled has some problems of its own with honest, open presentations of the facts about evolution, ID—and with its own agenda."
- It does raise some good points but on the other hand lines like this in the article, "Thousands of other biologists across the U.S. who all know evolution to be true are also still religious." makes me wonder when they threw out the word "theory" when talking of evolution. Tsk, tsk. And this from a scientific journal.

I like this one:

Welcome to Expelled Exposed, a detailed look at the Ben Stein movie Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed. We'll show you why this movie is not a documentary at all, but anti-science propaganda aimed at creating the appearance of controversy where there is none.


Excuse me? There is no controversy? Oh! OK! I'll just go back to sleep...

The film shows that there is a controversy and that in the end the origins of life cannot be explained to the opposing layman's or scientist's satisfaction by either side. Ultimately the question is, should both sides be presented in public schools at taxpayers expense? Or should the views of one side be squashed and tossed into the outer darkness.

The Intelligence Design side is not looking to expel the Evolutionist's from the schools, They want both sides taught, yet the Evolutionists have expelled the ID'ers. Free debate is the issue and the film shows if taken to it's ultimate conclusion scientists would find themselves having to form a hypothesis after the world view of evolutionists as opposed to facts seen through a microscope.

What cracked me up in the film is seing scientists saying perhaps life started on Earth (Gaia) by aliens from other planets seeding it or that life started off on the backs of crystals. - Of course this makes much more sense than thinking that God IS and that He created, designed life and used materials common to all life to create different forms, species etc.

Oh! I forgot. There is no controversy. I forgot I was on my way to take a nap...

~~~~~
Technorati Tags -
-
-
-

~~~~~

Wednesday, January 19, 2005

Court Rejects Challenge to Inaugural Prayer

Once again Michael Newdow looses in Court.

-----quotes from a couple sources -----


Newdow argued that saying a Christian prayer at the Jan. 20 ceremony would violate the Constitution by forcing him to accept unwanted religious beliefs. - CBS News 1-14-05

......................

Bates also questioned whether the lawsuit should be thrown out because the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals (search) ruled last year that Newdow did not suffer "a sufficiently concrete and specific injury" when he opposed prayers from being recited at Bush's first inauguration.

Newdow said his case is different this time because he actually has a ticket to attend the inauguration. He said being there live is different than four years ago, when he planned to watch the ceremony on television.

Justice Department lawyer Edward White scoffed at that claim, saying the issues in the two cases are the same and that Newdow still has not shown how he would be injured by hearing the prayer.
Fox News 1-15-05

--------end quotes-------

This citizen thinks -


Let me get this straight. - Watching it on TV 4 years ago did not convert him. - Going to see it live this time will convert him? Well if he doesn't want to be converted why is he going? It is obvious this guy has a problem. Perhaps Bush should include in his inaugural prayer a plea for God to help cure Newdow's obsession against prayer .

Sunday, January 16, 2005

To What Purpose?

Must be really sad to have no purpose in life. Unless you want to believe that fighting against God is a purpose.

On Jan. 14th 2005 Michael Newdow, professed atheist and sometime lawyer lost a round in his battle/request for an injunction to stop clergy-led prayer at next week's (Jan 20th, 2005) presidential inauguration. He tried the same trick in 2001.

Let me get this straight. Mr. Newdow does not believe there is a God. Since he believes there is no God then he must think that that which Christians believe in is nothing. Since he thinks God is nothing he is fighting against nothing and a persons right to talk (pray) to nothing. Since people who wander around and talk to nothing are considered insane he is really fighting against insanity. His real reason for being is that he is a frustrated shrink. I guess he is trying to use the law to heal the mental aberrations of Christians.... I hope that makes sense. Did I just prove his point?

Perhaps the real case of insanity he should fight against is his own. How anyone could look at the universe and not see that an engineering feat beyond the scope of our imaginations has taken place is beyond me. From the atoms to the galaxies and all points in between we see design. Not chaos as there would be if it were chance.


----------------------------------------------
"When a man is opposed to Christianity, it is because Christianity is opposed to him. Your infidel is usually a person who resents of Christianity to that in his nature and life which Jesus came to rebuke and destroy. -Robert Hall (1764-1831)-
----------------------------------------------